Re: [PATCH 6/6] PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling

From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Wed Aug 07 2019 - 14:09:52 EST


On 22/07/2019 17:37, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
> psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
> parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
> power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it.
>
> This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track
> of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the
> index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer
> instead of the CPUidle driver implementations.
>
> Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci
> into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert
> the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state
> parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware
> interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API.
>
> A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends
> now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state
> parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware
> interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

AFAICT,

Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog