Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

From: Matthias Kaehlcke
Date: Fri Aug 02 2019 - 14:27:46 EST


On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:57:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:07:56PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > The LED behavior of some Ethernet PHYs is configurable. Add an
> > optional 'leds' subnode with a child node for each LED to be
> > configured. The binding aims to be compatible with the common
> > LED binding (see devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt).
> >
> > A LED can be configured to be 'on' when a link with a certain speed
> > is active, or to blink on RX/TX activity. For the configuration to
> > be effective it needs to be supported by the hardware and the
> > corresponding PHY driver.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Changes in v4:
> > - patch added to the series
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > index f70f18ff821f..81c5aacc89a5 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> > @@ -153,6 +153,38 @@ properties:
> > Delay after the reset was deasserted in microseconds. If
> > this property is missing the delay will be skipped.
> >
> > +patternProperties:
> > + "^leds$":
> > + type: object
> > + description:
> > + Subnode with configuration of the PHY LEDs.
> > +
> > + patternProperties:
> > + "^led@[0-9]+$":
> > + type: object
> > + description:
> > + Subnode with the configuration of a single PHY LED.
> > +
> > + properties:
> > + reg:
> > + description:
> > + The ID number of the LED, typically corresponds to a hardware ID.
> > + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> > +
> > + linux,default-trigger:
> > + description:
> > + This parameter, if present, is a string specifying the trigger
> > + assigned to the LED. Supported triggers are:
> > + "phy_link_10m_active" - LED will be on when a 10Mb/s link is active
> > + "phy_link_100m_active" - LED will be on when a 100Mb/s link is active
> > + "phy_link_1g_active" - LED will be on when a 1Gb/s link is active
> > + "phy_link_10g_active" - LED will be on when a 10Gb/s link is active
> > + "phy_activity" - LED will blink when data is received or transmitted
>
> Matthias
>
> We should think a bit more about these names.
>
> I can see in future needing 1G link, but it blinks off when there is
> active traffic? So phy_link_1g_active could be confusing, and very similar to
> phy_link_1g_activity?

agreed, the 'active' vs' 'activity' can be confusing, let's avoid that.

> So maybe

> > + "phy_link_10m" - LED will be solid on when a 10Mb/s link is active
> > + "phy_link_100m" - LED will be solid on when a 100Mb/s link is active
> > + "phy_link_1g" - LED will be solid on when a 1Gb/s link is active
>
> etc.
>
> And then in the future we can have
>
> "phy_link_1g_activity' - LED will be on when 1Gbp/s
> link is active and blink off
> with activity.

sounds good to me

> What other use cases do we have? I don't want to support everything,
> but we should be able to represent the most common modes without the
> names getting too confusing.

Initially I planned to support to configure a LED to be solid for
multiple link speeds, however that could become a bit messy with the
string based triggers, unless we limit the possible combinations. My
expertise in network land is limited, so I'm not sure if that's an
important/realistic use case.