[PATCH RFC] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't take the cpu_hotplug_lock

[David Hildenbrand]

Commit 9852a7212324 ("mm: drop hotplug lock from lru_add_drain_all()")
states that lru_add_drain_all() "Doesn't need any cpu hotplug locking
because we do rely on per-cpu kworkers being shut down before our
page_alloc_cpu_dead callback is executed on the offlined cpu."

And also "Calling this function with cpu hotplug locks held can actually
lead to obscure indirect dependencies via WQ context.".

Since commit 3f906ba23689 ("mm/memory-hotplug: switch locking to a percpu
rwsem") we do a cpus_read_lock() in mem_hotplug_begin().

I don't see how that lock is still helpful, we already hold the
device_hotplug_lock to protect try_offline_node(), which is AFAIK one
problematic part that can race with CPU hotplug. If it is still
necessary, we should document why.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index e7c3b219a305..43b8cd4b96f5 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -86,14 +86,12 @@ __setup("memhp_default_state=", setup_memhp_default_state);
 
 void mem_hotplug_begin(void)
 {
-	cpus_read_lock();
 	percpu_down_write(&mem_hotplug_lock);
 }
 
 void mem_hotplug_done(void)
 {
 	percpu_up_write(&mem_hotplug_lock);
-	cpus_read_unlock();
 }
 
 u64 max_mem_size = U64_MAX;
-- 
2.21.0