Re: [PATCH] iio: accel: add missing sensor for some 2-in-1 based ultrabooks

From: Hans de Goede
Date: Wed May 29 2019 - 06:00:52 EST


Hi,

On 5/23/19 2:03 PM, LuÃs Ferreira wrote:
Hi Hams,

https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12322
https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/pull/262

As all the pull requests to systemd and iio-sensor-proxy has already
been merged, I just need your review on this:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12449

Then, I guess this patch is ready to go. Please let me know if theres any issue.

Thank you for your work on this. I've given a favorable review to the

last systemd pull-req.

Regards,

Hans


On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 at 16:08, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On 15-04-19 17:40, luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
April 6, 2019 10:36 AM, "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

Yes that seems the best way forward with this.

Note I think "base" is better then "keyboard" for the sensor which
is in the base/keyboard. But neither is perfect, so go which whatever
you prefer.

Reference to:
- https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/pull/262 > - https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12322

Thank you for your work on this, I see that Bastien has
already reviewed the iio-sensor-proxy changes.

I've just added one small remark to the systemd changes,
except for that small remark the systemd changes look good to me.

Regards,

Hams




On 06-04-19 01:01, LuÃs Ferreira wrote:

Hi,
Basically we need to come up with a convention to (optionally) indicate

the sensors location with a udev attribute set by:
/lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-sensor.hwdb
So should we start adding `ACCEL_LOCATION=display` and
`ACCEL_LOCATION=keyboard` attributes to that file and patch
iio-sensor-proxy to ignore the keyboard ones as a first step ?

Yes that seems the best way forward with this.

Note I think "base" is better then "keyboard" for the sensor which
is in the base/keyboard. But neither is perfect, so go which whatever
you prefer.

Thanks & Regards,

Hans

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 10:10, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On 02-04-19 18:04, LuÃs Ferreira wrote:
Some ultrabooks, like Teclast F6 Pro, use KIOX010A sensor on display
and KIOX020A sensor on keyboard base, to detect tablet mode or screen
orientation.

I deliberately left out the KIOX020A id for now, because currently
userspace cannot really deal with having 2 sensors.

See:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6557
https://github.com/hadess/iio-sensor-proxy/issues/166

Basically we need to come up with a convention to (optionally) indicate
the sensors location with a udev attribute set by:
/lib/udev/hwdb.d/60-sensor.hwdb

And then patch iio-sensor-proxy to consume that attribute and ignore
the one which has e.g. ACCEL_LOCATION=keyboard in its udev properties

Ignoring would be a first step, maybe later it can do something useful
with it, see e.g. : https://github.com/alesguzik/linux_detect_tablet_mode

IMHO we really should minimally get code in place for iio-sensor-proxy
to ignore the keyboard accelerometer before merging this patch.

I realize that having the code in place will not magically get it on
all users machines, but I believe this is the minimum which needs to
happen before we push this out and potentially breaks people screen
rotation.

I've had working on this on my TODO list for a long long time now,
but -ENOTIME. If you have some time to work on this then that would
be great.

Regards,

Hans
Signed-off-by: LuÃs Ferreira <luis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
index 7096e577b23f..9a5e445facc1 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/accel/kxcjk-1013.c
@@ -1492,6 +1492,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id kx_acpi_match[] = {
{"KIOX0009", KXTJ21009},
{"KIOX000A", KXCJ91008},
{"KIOX010A", KXCJ91008}, /* KXCJ91008 inside the display of a 2-in-1 */
+ {"KIOX020A", KXCJ91008},
{"KXTJ1009", KXTJ21009},
{"KXJ2109", KXTJ21009},
{"SMO8500", KXCJ91008},