Re: [PATCH] arm64: vdso: Explicitly add build-id option

From: Masahiro Yamada
Date: Thu May 16 2019 - 01:01:54 EST


On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:51 AM Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Commit 691efbedc60d ("arm64: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC) to
> link VDSO") switched to using LD explicitly. The --build-id option
> needs to be passed explicitly, similar to x86. Add this option.
>
> Fixes: 691efbedc60d ("arm64: vdso: use $(LD) instead of $(CC) to link VDSO")
> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> index 744b9dbaba03..ca209103cd06 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/vdso/Makefile
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ targets := $(obj-vdso) vdso.so vdso.so.dbg
> obj-vdso := $(addprefix $(obj)/, $(obj-vdso))
>
> ldflags-y := -shared -nostdlib -soname=linux-vdso.so.1 \
> + $(call ld-option, --build-id) \
> $(call ld-option, --hash-style=sysv) -n -T
>
> # Disable gcov profiling for VDSO code


I missed that. Sorry.

You can add --build-id without $(call ld-option,...)
because it is supported by our minimal version of toolchain.

See commit log of 1e0221374e for example.


Otherwise, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
Best Regards

Masahiro Yamada