Re: [PATCH v1] mtd: rawnand: Add Macronix NAND read retry support

From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Fri May 10 2019 - 09:55:07 EST


Hi Mason,

Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Fri, 10 May
2019 15:37:04 +0200:

> Hello,
>
> Some purely cosmetic suggestions below.
>
> On Fri, 10 May 2019 15:41:02 +0800
> Mason Yang <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > + if (ret)
> > + pr_err("set feature failed to read retry moded:%d\n", mode);
>
> I don't know what is the policy in the MTD/NAND subsystem, but
> shouldn't you be using dev_err() instead of pr_err() here to have a
> nice prefix for the message ?
>
> dev_err(&nand_to_mtd(chip)->dev, "set feature ..", mode);

Indeed. You can even dereference an mtd_info object first, then use
mtd->dev.

>
> > +static void macronix_nand_onfi_init(struct nand_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + struct nand_parameters *p = &chip->parameters;
> > +
> > + if (p->onfi) {
>
> Change to:
>
> if (!p->onfi)
> return;
>
> This way the rest of the function can save one level of indentation.
>
> > + struct nand_onfi_vendor_macronix *mxic =
> > + (void *)p->onfi->vendor;
> > +
> > + if (mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT) {
>
> Change to:
>
> if (mxic->reliability_func & MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_BIT == 0)
> return;
>
> And the rest of the function can save one level of indentation.
>
> > + chip->read_retries = MACRONIX_READ_RETRY_MODE + 1;
> > + chip->setup_read_retry =
> > + macronix_nand_setup_read_retry;
> > + if (p->supports_set_get_features) {
> > + set_bit(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_READ_RETRY,
> > + p->set_feature_list);
> > + set_bit(ONFI_FEATURE_ADDR_READ_RETRY,
> > + p->get_feature_list);
> > + }
>
> Which will require less wrapping in those lines that are already at the
> third indentation level.
>
> To me, it is also more logical: we exclude the cases we are not
> interested in and return early, and then if we are still in the case we
> are interested, we handle it.

I definitely agree with these cosmetic changes.

Thanks,
MiquÃl