Re: [PATCH 2/8] soc: tegra: fuse: Change to the correct __dma_request_channel() prototype

[Dmitry Osipenko]

07.05.2019 9:09, Baolin Wang ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Since we've introduced one device node parameter for __dma_request_channel(),
> thus change to the correct function prototype.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> index 49ff017..e2571b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/fuse/fuse-tegra20.c
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int tegra20_fuse_probe(struct tegra_fuse *fuse)
>  	dma_cap_zero(mask);
>  	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>  
> -	fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL);
> +	fuse->apbdma.chan = __dma_request_channel(&mask, dma_filter, NULL, NULL);
>  	if (!fuse->apbdma.chan)
>  		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  
> 

1) Kernel should be kept bisect'able by not having intermediate patches
that break compilation. Hence you should squash the changes into a
single patch.

2) Better to replace __dma_request_channel() with dma_request_channel()
since they are equal.

-- 
Dmitry