Re: [PATCH v3 11/13] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Provide fwnode for the USB connector

From: Hans de Goede
Date: Wed Apr 17 2019 - 05:52:07 EST


Hi,

On 12-04-19 15:41, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
In ACPI, and now also in DT, the USB connectors usually have
their own device nodes. In case of USB Type-C, those
connector (port) nodes are child nodes of the controller or
PHY device, in our case the fusb302. The software fwnodes
allow us to create a similar child node for fusb302 that
represents the connector also on Intel CHT.

This makes it possible replace the fusb302 specific device
properties which were deprecated with the common USB
connector properties that tcpm.c is able to use directly.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
index 863a792d9282..eff5990322ff 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_cht_int33fe.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/usb/pd.h>
#define EXPECTED_PTYPE 4
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ enum {
INT33FE_NODE_FUSB302,
INT33FE_NODE_MAX17047,
INT33FE_NODE_PI3USB30532,
+ INT33FE_NODE_USB_CONNECTOR,
INT33FE_NODE_MAX,
};
@@ -111,9 +113,29 @@ cht_int33fe_register_max17047(struct device *dev, struct cht_int33fe_data *data)
static const struct property_entry fusb302_props[] = {
PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("linux,extcon-name", "cht_wcove_pwrsrc"),
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("fcs,max-sink-microvolt", 12000000),
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("fcs,max-sink-microamp", 3000000),
- PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("fcs,max-sink-microwatt", 36000000),

Note that the 36000000 value being removed here is max-sink-microwatt,
esp. the _max_ part is important. And recent versions of the fusb302
code ignore this entirely.

+ { }
+};
+
+#define PDO_FIXED_FLAGS \
+ (PDO_FIXED_DUAL_ROLE | PDO_FIXED_DATA_SWAP | PDO_FIXED_USB_COMM)
+
+static const u32 src_pdo[] = {
+ PDO_FIXED(5000, 1500, PDO_FIXED_FLAGS),
+};
+
+static const u32 snk_pdo[] = {
+ PDO_FIXED(5000, 400, PDO_FIXED_FLAGS),
+ PDO_VAR(5000, 12000, 3000),
+};
+
+static const struct property_entry usb_connector_props[] = {
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("name", "connector"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("data-role", "dual"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("power-role", "dual"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING("try-power-role", "sink"),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY("source-pdos", src_pdo),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY("sink-pdos", snk_pdo),
+ PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32("op-sink-microwatt", 36000000),

Where as "op-sink-microwatt" is more interpreted as a minimum
value for non PPS supplies not being able to deliver this causes
the Capability Mismatch to get set. But for PPS supplies if I'm
reading the code correctly, the entire PPS negotiation is failed
by tcpm.c if this cannot be matched. I guess / hope that there
is a fallback to none PPS PDOs then but I'm not sure.

Anyways the charger the GPD-win ships with is a non PD capable
5V/2A charger and the GPD-pocket ships with a charger which does
max 12V/2A. The device itself will work fine on around 10W and
even charge at that level (albeit slowly). So I believe that 10W
would be a better value for "op-sink-microwatt" (the dt-binding
says it is mandatory so we cannot just leave it out).

Regards,

Hans





{ }
};
@@ -148,6 +170,15 @@ static int cht_int33fe_add_nodes(struct cht_int33fe_data *data)
data->node[i] = fwnode;
}
+ /* Node for the USB connector (FUSB302 is the parent) */
+ fwnode = fwnode_create_software_node(usb_connector_props,
+ data->node[INT33FE_NODE_FUSB302]);
+ if (IS_ERR(fwnode)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(fwnode);
+ goto err_remove_nodes;
+ }
+ data->node[INT33FE_NODE_USB_CONNECTOR] = fwnode;
+
return 0;
err_remove_nodes: