Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the block tree

[Bart Van Assche]

On 4/14/19 10:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/scsi/sd.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   c92e2f04b359 ("block: disk_events: introduce event flags")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   21e6ba3f0e02 ("scsi: sd: Rely on the driver core for asynchronous probing")
>   d16ece577bf2 ("scsi: sd: Inline sd_probe_part2()")
> 
> from the scsi tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen for having resolved this conflict. The conflict resolution
looks good to me.

Bart.