Re: [PATCH v6 04/12] firmware: ti_sci: Add RM mapping table for am654

From: Tony Lindgren
Date: Thu Apr 11 2019 - 10:54:23 EST


Hi,

* Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@xxxxxx> [190410 04:15]:
> From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt
> index b56a02c10ae6..6f0cd31c1520 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/keystone/ti,sci.txt
> @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ relationship between the TI-SCI parent node to the child node.
>
> Required properties:
> -------------------
> -- compatible: should be "ti,k2g-sci"
> +- compatible: should be "ti,k2g-sci" for TI 66AK2G SoC
> + should be "ti,am654-sci" for for TI AM654 SoC
> - mbox-names:
> "rx" - Mailbox corresponding to receive path
> "tx" - Mailbox corresponding to transmit path
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index d303f5a14da9..88e461498def 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2297,10 +2297,33 @@ static const struct ti_sci_desc ti_sci_pmmc_k2g_desc = {
> /* Limited by MBOX_TX_QUEUE_LEN. K2G can handle upto 128 messages! */
> .max_msgs = 20,
> .max_msg_size = 64,
> + .rm_type_map = NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static struct ti_sci_rm_type_map ti_sci_am654_rm_type_map[] = {
> + {.dev_id = 56, .type = 0x00b}, /* GIC_IRQ */
> + {.dev_id = 179, .type = 0x000}, /* MAIN_NAV_UDMASS_IA0 */
> + {.dev_id = 187, .type = 0x009}, /* MAIN_NAV_RA */
> + {.dev_id = 188, .type = 0x006}, /* MAIN_NAV_UDMAP */
> + {.dev_id = 194, .type = 0x007}, /* MCU_NAV_UDMAP */
> + {.dev_id = 195, .type = 0x00a}, /* MCU_NAV_RA */
> + {.dev_id = 0, .type = 0x000}, /* end of table */
> +};
> +
> +/* Description for AM654 */
> +static const struct ti_sci_desc ti_sci_pmmc_am654_desc = {
> + .default_host_id = 12,
> + /* Conservative duration */
> + .max_rx_timeout_ms = 10000,
> + /* Limited by MBOX_TX_QUEUE_LEN. K2G can handle upto 128 messages! */
> + .max_msgs = 20,
> + .max_msg_size = 60,
> + .rm_type_map = ti_sci_am654_rm_type_map,
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id ti_sci_of_match[] = {
> {.compatible = "ti,k2g-sci", .data = &ti_sci_pmmc_k2g_desc},
> + {.compatible = "ti,am654-sci", .data = &ti_sci_pmmc_am654_desc},
> { /* Sentinel */ },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_sci_of_match);

Great, this approach with mapping table in the driver based on
the compatible looks good to me and avoids stuffing the IDs
into device tree:

Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>