Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] module: Make __tracepoints_ptrs as read-only

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:57:08 -0400
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This series hardens the tracepoints in modules by making the array of
> pointers referring to the tracepoints as read-only. This array is needed
> during module unloading to verify that the tracepoint is quiescent.
> There is no reason for the array to be to be writable after init, and
> can cause security or other hidden bugs. Mark these as ro_after_init.
> 
> Suggested-by: paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Suggested-by: keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Suggested-by: mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  kernel/module.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index 8b9631e789f0..be980aaa8804 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3320,6 +3320,12 @@ static const char * const ro_after_init_sections[] = {
>  	 * by the SRCU notifiers
>  	 */
>  	"___srcu_struct_ptrs",
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Array of tracepoint pointers used for checking if tracepoints are
> +	 * quiescent during unloading.
> +	 */
> +	"__tracepoints_ptrs",

Do we ever modify the __tracepoint_ptrs section? I know the jump_label
sections are sorted on load, which means they need to be writable
during init, but if __tracepoint_ptrs is not sorted or touched during
load, why not just put them in the rodata section to begin with?

-- Steve

>  };
>  
>  static struct module *layout_and_allocate(struct load_info *info, int flags)