[PATCH] sysctl: redefine zero as a unsigned long

From: Hou Tao
Date: Fri Apr 05 2019 - 02:48:04 EST


We have got KASAN splat when tried to set /proc/sys/fs/file-max:

BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x3e4/0x8f0
Read of size 8 at addr ffff20000f9b2980 by task file-max.sh/36819

Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f8
show_stack+0x3c/0x60
dump_stack+0x150/0x1a8
print_address_description+0x2b8/0x5a0
kasan_report+0x278/0x648
__asan_load8+0x124/0x170
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x3e4/0x8f0
proc_doulongvec_minmax+0x80/0xa0
proc_sys_call_handler+0x188/0x2a0
proc_sys_write+0x5c/0x80
__vfs_write+0x118/0x578
vfs_write+0x184/0x418
ksys_write+0xfc/0x1e8
__arm64_sys_write+0x88/0xa8
el0_svc_common+0x1a4/0x500
el0_svc_handler+0xb8/0x180
el0_svc+0x8/0xc

The buggy address belongs to the variable:
zero+0x0/0x40

The cause is that proc_doulongvec_minmax() is trying to cast an int
pointer (namely &zero) to a unsigned long pointer, and dereferencing it.

Although the warning seems does no harm, because zero will be placed
in a .bss section, but it's better to kill the KASAN warning by
redefining zero as a unsigned long, so it's OK whenever it is accessed
as an int or a a unsigned long.

An alternative fix seems to be set the minimal value of file-max to be 1,
so one_ul can be used instead, but I'm not sure whether or not a file-max
with a value of zero has special purpose (e.g., prohibit the file-related
activities of all no-privileged users).

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sysctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index e5da394d1ca3..03846e015013 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int sixty = 60;

static int __maybe_unused neg_one = -1;

-static int zero;
+static unsigned long zero;
static int __maybe_unused one = 1;
static int __maybe_unused two = 2;
static int __maybe_unused four = 4;
--
2.16.2.dirty