Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] pid: add pidctl()

From: Christian Brauner
Date: Tue Mar 26 2019 - 12:31:50 EST


On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:23:37PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 09:17:07AM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 8:55 AM Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The pidctl() syscalls builds on, extends, and improves translate_pid() [4].
> > > I quote Konstantins original patchset first that has already been acked and
> > > picked up by Eric before and whose functionality is preserved in this
> > > syscall:
> >
> > We still haven't had a much-needed conversation about splitting this
> > system call into smaller logical operations. It's important that we
> > address this point before this patch is merged and becomes permanent
> > kernel ABI.
>
> I don't particularly mind splitting this into an additional syscall like
> e.g. pidfd_open() but then we have - and yes, I know you'll say
> syscalls are cheap - translate_pid(), and pidfd_open(). What I like
> about this rn is that it connects both apis in a single syscall
> and allows pidfd retrieval across pid namespaces. So I guess we'll see
> what other people think.

There's something to be said for

pidfd_open(pid_t pid, int pidfd, unsigned int flags);

/* get pidfd */
int pidfd = pidfd_open(1234, -1, 0);

/* convert to procfd */
int procfd = pidfd_open(-1, 4, 0);

/* convert to pidfd */
int pidfd = pidfd_open(4, -1, 0);