Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: Enable dmc and dfi nodes on gru.

From: Chanwoo Choi
Date: Wed Mar 20 2019 - 01:05:14 EST


Hi GaÃl,

On 19. 3. 20. ìì 3:13, GaÃl PORTAY wrote:
> From: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Enable the DMC (Dynamic Memory Controller) and the DFI (DDR PHY Interface)
> nodes on gru/kevin boards so we can support DDR DVFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: GaÃl PORTAY <gael.portay@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - [PATCH 8/8] Move center-supply attribute of dmc node in file
> rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi (where ppvar_centerlogic is
> defined).
>
> Changes in v1: None
>
> .../dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
> index 931640e9aed4..cfb81356c61e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru-chromebook.dtsi
> @@ -400,3 +400,7 @@ ap_i2c_tp: &i2c5 {
> rockchip,pins = <0 8 RK_FUNC_GPIO &pcfg_pull_none>;
> };
> };
> +
> +&dmc {
> + center-supply = <&ppvar_centerlogic>;
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
> index da03fa9c5662..d14dce679e7a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-gru.dtsi
> @@ -289,6 +289,12 @@
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&dmc_opp_table {
> + opp04 {
> + opp-suspend;
> + };
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Set some suspend operating points to avoid OVP in suspend
> *
> @@ -368,6 +374,10 @@
> <200000000>;
> };
>
> +&display_subsystem {
> + devfreq = <&dmc>;
> +};

When I checked the rockchip_drm_drv.c on linux-next.git (20190320),
there are no any codes about this. Maybe it should be removed.

> +
> &emmc_phy {
> status = "okay";
> };
> @@ -489,6 +499,16 @@ ap_i2c_audio: &i2c8 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> +&dfi {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&dmc {
> + status = "okay";
> + upthreshold = <25>;
> + downdifferential = <15>;
> +};
> +
> &sdhci {
> /*
> * Signal integrity isn't great at 200 MHz and 150 MHz (DDR) gives the
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 8fe86a3e7658..010b3e5267a0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
> };
> };
>
> - display-subsystem {
> + display_subsystem: display-subsystem {
> compatible = "rockchip,display-subsystem";
> ports = <&vopl_out>, <&vopb_out>;
> };
>


--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics