Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] dt-bindings: mfd: Add compatible for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC

[Sean Wang]

Hi,

Always put the patches about dt-binding changes at the head of the
series to let the related maintainer more easily find them.

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:48 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
<hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This adds compatible for the MediaTek MT6358 PMIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt | 11 ++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> index 0ebd08a..62f1c17 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/mt6397.txt
> @@ -17,22 +17,27 @@ Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/pwrap.txt
>  This document describes the binding for MFD device and its sub module.
>
>  Required properties:
> -compatible: "mediatek,mt6397" or "mediatek,mt6323"
> +compatible:
> +       "mediatek,mt6323" for PMIC MT6323
> +       "mediatek,mt6358" for PMIC MT6358
> +       "mediatek,mt6397" for PMIC MT6397

don't change anything not related MT6358

>
>  Optional subnodes:
>
>  - rtc
>         Required properties:
> -               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-rtc"
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-rtc" or "mediatek,mt6358-rtc"
>  - regulators
>         Required properties:
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-regulator"
>         see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6397-regulator.txt
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6358-regulator"
> +       see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6358-regulator.txt
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6323-regulator"
>         see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regulator/mt6323-regulator.txt
>  - codec
>         Required properties:
> -               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-codec"
> +               - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-codec" or "mediatek,mt6358-sound"

why didn't we use a more consistent naming as mt6358-codec?

>  - clk
>         Required properties:
>                 - compatible: "mediatek,mt6397-clk"
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek