Re: [PATCH v2] RDMA/umem: minor bug fix and cleanup in error handling paths

From: John Hubbard
Date: Sun Mar 03 2019 - 17:37:55 EST


On 3/3/19 1:52 AM, Artemy Kovalyov wrote:


On 02/03/2019 21:44, Ira Weiny wrote:

On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 12:24:35PM -0800, john.hubbard@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>

...
3. Dead code removal: the check for (user_virt & ~page_mask)
is checking for a condition that can never happen,
because earlier:

ÂÂÂÂ user_virt = user_virt & page_mask;

...so, remove that entire phrase.

ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ bcnt -= min_t(size_t, npages << PAGE_SHIFT, bcnt);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ mutex_lock(&umem_odp->umem_mutex);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ for (j = 0; j < npages; j++, user_virt += PAGE_SIZE) {
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (user_virt & ~page_mask) {
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ p += PAGE_SIZE;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ if (page_to_phys(local_page_list[j]) != p) {
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ret = -EFAULT;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ break;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ }
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ put_page(local_page_list[j]);
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ continue;
-ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ }
-

I think this is trying to account for compound pages. (ie page_mask could
represent more than PAGE_SIZE which is what user_virt is being incrimented by.)
But putting the page in that case seems to be the wrong thing to do?

Yes this was added by Artemy[1] now cc'ed.

Right, this is for huge pages, please keep it.
put_page() needed to decrement refcount of the head page.


OK, thanks for explaining! Artemy, while you're here, any thoughts about the
release_pages, and the change of the starting point, from the other part of the patch:

@@ -684,9 +677,11 @@ int ib_umem_odp_map_dma_pages(struct ib_umem_odp *umem_odp, u64 user_virt,
mutex_unlock(&umem_odp->umem_mutex);

if (ret < 0) {
- /* Release left over pages when handling errors. */
- for (++j; j < npages; ++j)
- put_page(local_page_list[j]);
+ /*
+ * Release pages, starting at the the first page
+ * that experienced an error.
+ */
+ release_pages(&local_page_list[j], npages - j);
break;
}
}

?

thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA