Re: [PATCH] drm/vkms: Solve bug on kms_crc_cursor tests

From: Ville Syrjälä
Date: Thu Feb 28 2019 - 09:03:48 EST


On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:11:07AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:26:06AM -0300, Shayenne Moura wrote:
> > vkms_crc_work_handle needs the value of the actual frame to
> > schedule the workqueue that calls periodically the vblank
> > handler and the destroy state functions. However, the frame
> > value returned from vkms_vblank_simulate is updated and
> > diminished in vblank_get_timestamp because it is not in a
> > vblank interrupt, and return an inaccurate value.
> >
> > Solve this getting the actual vblank frame directly from the
> > vblank->count inside the `struct drm_crtc`, instead of using
> > the `drm_accurate_vblank_count` function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Sorry for the delay, I'm a bit swamped right now :-/
>
> Debug work you're doing here is really impressive! But I have no idea
> what's going on. It doesn't look like it's just papering over a bug (like
> the in_vblank_irq check we've discussed on irc), but I also have no idea
> why it works.
>
> I'll pull in Ville, he understands this better than me.

It's not entirely clear what we're trying to fix. From what I can see
the crc work seems to be in no way synchronized with page flips, so
I'm not sure how all this is really supposed to work.

> -Daniel
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c | 4 +++-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c | 4 +++-
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > index d7b409a3c0f8..09a8b00ef1f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crc.c
> > @@ -161,6 +161,8 @@ void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
> > struct vkms_output *out = drm_crtc_to_vkms_output(crtc);
> > struct vkms_device *vdev = container_of(out, struct vkms_device,
> > output);
> > + unsigned int pipe = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
> > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &crtc->dev->vblank[pipe];
> > struct vkms_crc_data *primary_crc = NULL;
> > struct vkms_crc_data *cursor_crc = NULL;
> > struct drm_plane *plane;
> > @@ -196,7 +198,7 @@ void vkms_crc_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
> > if (primary_crc)
> > crc32 = _vkms_get_crc(primary_crc, cursor_crc);
> >
> > - frame_end = drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(crtc);
> > + frame_end = vblank->count;
> >
> > /* queue_work can fail to schedule crc_work; add crc for
> > * missing frames
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > index 8a9aeb0a9ea8..9bf3268e2e92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_crtc.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart vkms_vblank_simulate(struct hrtimer *timer)
> > vblank_hrtimer);
> > struct drm_crtc *crtc = &output->crtc;
> > struct vkms_crtc_state *state = to_vkms_crtc_state(crtc->state);
> > + unsigned int pipe = drm_crtc_index(crtc);
> > + struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &crtc->dev->vblank[pipe];
> > u64 ret_overrun;
> > bool ret;
> >
> > @@ -20,7 +22,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart vkms_vblank_simulate(struct hrtimer *timer)
> > DRM_ERROR("vkms failure on handling vblank");
> >
> > if (state && output->crc_enabled) {
> > - u64 frame = drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(crtc);
> > + u64 frame = vblank->count;
> >
> > /* update frame_start only if a queued vkms_crc_work_handle()
> > * has read the data
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel