Re: [PATCH] scripts: gdb: redefine MS_RDONLY

From: Kieran Bingham
Date: Fri Feb 15 2019 - 15:29:06 EST


Hi Felipe,

Thank you for the patch,

On 15/02/2019 11:29, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Since commit e262e32d6bde0f77fb0c95d977482fc872c51996 "vfs: Suppress
> MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled", the
> generated gdb scripts can't be used anymore. That commit moved the
> definition of MS_* flags but forgot to update gdb scripts to use the
> new location. This patch includes <uapi/linux/mount.h> to
> constants.py.in so gdb scripts are functional again.
>
> Fixes: e262e32d6bde "vfs: Suppress MS_* flag defs within the kernel unless explicitly enabled"
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in b/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
> index 7aad82406422..c2a93805d911 100644
> --- a/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
> +++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/constants.py.in
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/fs.h>

Do we still need linux/fs.h?

> +#include <uapi/linux/mount.h>

Perhaps this should go at the end to maintain alphabetical ordering?

> #include <linux/mount.h>
> #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>

We can see from Dan's patch - that the comment above the value
definitions also needs to be updated...

Felipe, you won the patch race - how would you like to handle this? Will
you resubmit with changes? or should we just add the missing Fixes: tag
to Dan's patch?


--
Regards
--
Kieran