Re: [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:52:53PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg at al,
> > > >
> > > > These fix two issues on top of the recent device links material in
> > > > driver-core/driver-core-next.
> > > >
> > > > The first one fixes a race condition that may trigger when
> > > > __pm_runtime_set_status() is used incorrectly (that is, when it is
> > > > called with PM-runtime enabled for the target device and working).
> > > >
> > > > The second one fixes a supplier PM-runtime usage counter imbalance
> > > > resulting from adding and removing (e.g. in the error code path) a
> > > > stateless device link to it from within the consumer driver's probe
> > > > callback.
> > > >
> > > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
> > >
> > > Looks good, all now queued up, thanks.
> >
> > Greg, please don't get me wrong, but ~1.5 hours isn't sufficient for
> > me to review/test submitted patches.
> >
> > I have been trying to collaborate (review/test) device links related
> > code with Rafael, but what's the point if you queue up the patches,
> > before I even got the change to look at them. Shall I interpret it as
> > you don't care about me reviewing this, then just tell me so I don't
> > have to waste my time.
>
> As they are just in my -testing branch, I can easily drop them now if
> you find problems.  I didn't realize that Rafael was wanting you to
> review this as they were marked as "fixes:" for previous patches.

Sorry for the confusion.

>From my perspective they fix issues on top of the previous commits as
indicated by the Fixes: tags and they work on my systems, but even
though *I* think that they are all good, there still may be problems
with them that I don't see.  As usual. :-)

I guess I should have sent them as RFC this time.

Cheers,
Rafael