Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/mincore: provide mapped status when cached status is not allowed

[Jiri Kosina]

On Tue, 12 Feb 2019, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I would go with patch 1 for 5.1. Patches 2 still sounds controversial or
> incomplete to me. 

Is it because of the disagreement what 'non-blocking' really means, or do 
you see something else missing?

Merging patch just patch 1 withouth patch 2 is probably sort of useless 
excercise, unfortunately.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs