Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: rtc: add device-tree bindings for the Amlogic Meson RTC

From: Martin Blumenstingl
Date: Fri Feb 08 2019 - 19:10:40 EST


Hi,

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 11:31 PM Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 19/01/2019 15:43:31+0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > The 32-bit Amlogic Meson SoCs (Meson6, Meson8, Meson8b and Meson8m2)
> > have a built-in RTC block.
> > It has the following inputs:
> > - an 32.768kHz crystal oscillator
> > - an interrupt line
> > - a reset line
> > - 0.9V voltage input
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [resurrected patches from Ben after 2 years]
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-meson.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-meson.txt
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-meson.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-meson.txt
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..23df3cf2dd73
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/rtc-meson.txt
> > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> > +* Amlogic Meson6, Meson8, Meson8b and Meson8m2 RTC
> > +
> > +Required properties:
> > +- compatible: should be one of the following describing the hardware:
> > + * "amlogic,meson6-rtc"
> > + * "amlogic,meson8-rtc"
> > + * "amlogic,meson8b-rtc"
> > + * "amlogic,meson8m2-rtc"
> > +
> > +- reg: physical register space for the controller's memory mapped registers.
> > +- interrupts: the interrupt line of the RTC block.
> > +- clocks: reference to the external 32.768kHz crystal oscillator.
> > +- vdd-supply: reference to the power supply of the RTC block.
> > +- resets: reset controller reference to allow reset of the controller
> > +
> > +Optional properties:
> > +- #address-cells: should be 1 to address the internal non-volatile memory
> > +- #address-cells: should be 1 to reference the internal non-volatile memory
>
> Shouldn't that one be #size-cells ?
indeed, thanks for spotting!


Martin