Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: optimization of update_blocked_averages()

From: Vincent Guittot
Date: Fri Feb 08 2019 - 10:45:08 EST


On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 16:40, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Argh head hurts!!
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 05:14:21PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > @@ -4438,6 +4450,10 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> > /* adjust cfs_rq_clock_task() */
> > cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
> > cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
> > +
> > + /* Add cfs_rq with already running entity in the list */
> > + if (cfs_rq->nr_running >= 1)
> > + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
>
> Do we want the below to go with the above change?
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 38d4669aa2ef..0bd80a891025 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4536,6 +4536,8 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> /* update hierarchical throttle state */
> walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq);
>
> + assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
> +

Good point but this should go after the for_each_sched_entity() loop

> if (!cfs_rq->load.weight)
> return;
>