Re: [PATCH] staging:iio:ad7152: Rename misspelled RESEVERD -> RESERVED

From: Rodrigo Ribeiro
Date: Fri Jan 25 2019 - 19:15:12 EST


Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 Ãs 21:46, Rodrigo Ribeiro
<rodrigorsdc@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 Ãs 06:20, Alexandru Ardelean
> <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:35 PM Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Remove the checkpatch.pl check:
> > >
> > > CHECK: 'RESEVERD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RESERVED'?
> >
> > Hey,
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for answering.
>
> > A bit curios about this one.
> > Are you using this chip/driver ?
>
> No, I am just a student at USP (University of SÃo Paulo) starting in Linux
> Kernel and a new member of the USP Linux Kernel group that has contributed
> for a few months.
>
> > Thing is: the part is nearing EOL, and it could be an idea to be
> > marked for removal (since it's still in staging).
> > But if there are users for this driver, it could be left around for a while.
>
> This is my first patch in Linux Kernel, but if the driver will be removed, I
> can send a patch for another driver. Is there any driver that I can
> fix a style warning?

Maybe, one checkstyle patch is enough, right? Which drivers can I truly
contribute to?

> Thanks
>
>
> Em sex, 25 de jan de 2019 Ãs 06:20, Alexandru Ardelean
> <ardeleanalex@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:35 PM Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Remove the checkpatch.pl check:
> > >
> > > CHECK: 'RESEVERD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RESERVED'?
> >
> > Hey,
> >
> > A bit curios about this one.
> > Are you using this chip/driver ?
> >
> > Thing is: the part is nearing EOL, and it could be an idea to be
> > marked for removal (since it's still in staging).
> > But if there are users for this driver, it could be left around for a while.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Alex
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Ribeiro <rodrigorsdc@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rafael Tsuha <rafael.tsuha@xxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > This macro is not used anywhere. Should we just correct the
> > > spelling or remove the macro?
> > >
> > > drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > > index 25f51db..c9da6d4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/cdc/ad7152.c
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CH2_GAIN_HIGH 12
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CH2_SETUP 14
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CFG 15
> > > -#define AD7152_REG_RESEVERD 16
> > > +#define AD7152_REG_RESERVED 16
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CAPDAC_POS 17
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CAPDAC_NEG 18
> > > #define AD7152_REG_CFG2 26
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >