Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / devfreq: fix indentation in devfreq_add_device()

[Joe Perches]

On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 10:58 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 19. 1. 20. ìì 1:04, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > To beautify the code format.

I believe half of the changes are actually _less_ beautiful.

> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c
[]
> > @@ -683,16 +683,15 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
> >  		goto err_out;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	devfreq->trans_table =
> > -		devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> > -			     array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
> > -					 devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > -					 devfreq->profile->max_state),
> > -			     GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	devfreq->trans_table = devm_kzalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> > +					    array3_size(sizeof(unsigned int),
> > +					    devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > +					    devfreq->profile->max_state),
> > +					    GFP_KERNEL);

I think this bit is worse because the array3_size arguments
are no longer aligned.

> >  	devfreq->time_in_state = devm_kcalloc(&devfreq->dev,
> > -						devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > -						sizeof(unsigned long),
> > -						GFP_KERNEL);
> > +					      devfreq->profile->max_state,
> > +					      sizeof(unsigned long),
> > +					      GFP_KERNEL);

and this bit is better.