Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: use WP GPIO in sdhci_check_ro()

From: Thomas Petazzoni
Date: Wed Jan 16 2019 - 08:20:46 EST


Hello Adrian,

On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 14:59:32 +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:

> > The below patch simply changes sdhci_check_ro() to use the value of
> > the WP GPIO if available. We need to adjust the prototype of the
> > function to use a mmc_host* as argument instead of sdhci_host*, since
> > the mmc_can_gpio_ro() and mmc_gpio_get_ro() helpers take a mmc_host*.
>
> Why not just use host->mmc

Could do that. I just found it weird that the calling function has the
mmc_host structure, does some gymnastic to find sdhci_host, and then in
the called function, we do the opposite gymnastic to find mmc_host from
sdhci_host. But if that's the preference, I'm happy to change the patch
accordingly.


> > if (host->flags & SDHCI_DEVICE_DEAD)
> > is_readonly = 0;
> > + else if (mmc_can_gpio_ro(mmc))
> > + is_readonly = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);
>
> Perhaps host->ops->get_ro should be checked before mmc_can_gpio_ro()?

That is actually a good point, using ->get_ro() should come before
using the GPIO. Indeed, some drivers may potentially have a ->get_ro
with custom logic *and* a WP GPIO, and in this case, we want ->get_ro
to take precedence. I'll send a v2 with this, once you let me know your
decision about the previous point.

Thanks,

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com