Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Thu Jan 10 2019 - 13:11:20 EST


Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number
> > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one
> > > reason or another.
> > >
> > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking
> > > compatibility, doing a number of steps:
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all
> > > architectures but that we definitely want there.
> >
> > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k.
> > Is that intentional?
>
> Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I
> forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with
> time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in
> 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both
> io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit
> architectures, I can add that as well.

Thanks, sounds fine to me.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds