Re: [PATCH 6/7] drm: Remove use of drm_mode_object

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Thu Dec 20 2018 - 02:04:15 EST


On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 07:28:36PM -0200, Shayenne Moura wrote:
> This patch removes the drm_mode_object prints, evaluation and use from
> drm_display_mode objects used in drm files. It removes dependency from
> drm_mode_object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shayenne Moura <shayenneluzmoura@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c | 5 ++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> index a3c81850e755..cc5cc8d109a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_helper.c
> @@ -386,9 +386,8 @@ bool drm_crtc_helper_set_mode(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> if (!encoder_funcs)
> continue;
>
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] set [MODE:%d:%s]\n",
> - encoder->base.id, encoder->name,
> - mode->base.id, mode->name);
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("[ENCODER:%d:%s] set [MODE:%s]\n",
> + encoder->base.id, encoder->name, mode->name);
> if (encoder_funcs->mode_set)
> encoder_funcs->mode_set(encoder, mode, adjusted_mode);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> index 24a750436559..e2689afdcf50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> @@ -71,11 +71,6 @@ struct drm_display_mode *drm_mode_create(struct drm_device *dev)
> if (!nmode)
> return NULL;
>
> - if (drm_mode_object_add(dev, &nmode->base, DRM_MODE_OBJECT_MODE)) {
> - kfree(nmode);
> - return NULL;
> - }

You seem to have lost the 3rd hunk here compared to the previous version.

For reordering patches the best way is to use

$ git rebase --interactive

which fires up a text editor where you can reorder the patches as you see
fit. That way you don't have to touch them and risk breaking something.

Another thing: When resending patches unchanged, and your previous version
has received r-b/a-b tags, please include them. That way people know what
still needs to be reviewed and what is already reviewed. I think there was
also some other patches than this one that I reviewed already, can you pls
redo the patch series with r-b tags included, patch commit log (where you
did change something) added and then resend?

Threading looks good now.

Thanks, Daniel

> -
> return nmode;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_create);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch