Re: [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device

[Vivek Gautam]

On 11/24/2018 12:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:32:24PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > Hi Will,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:09 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > > > From: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
> > > > gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
> > > > the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
> > > > separately.
> > > > Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
> > > > runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
> > > > that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
> > > > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > > >   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > > Given that you're doing the get/put in the TLBI ops unconditionally:
> > >
> > > >   static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > >   {
> > > >        struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> > > > +     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> > > >
> > > > -     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> > > > +     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> > > > +             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> > > >                smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_flush_all(smmu_domain);
> > > > +             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> > > > +     }
> > > >   }
> > > >
> > > >   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > >   {
> > > >        struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
> > > > +     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
> > > >
> > > > -     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
> > > > +     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
> > > > +             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
> > > >                smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync(smmu_domain);
> > > > +             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
> > > > +     }
> > > Why do you need them around the map/unmap calls as well?
> > We still have .tlb_add_flush path?
> Ok, so we could add the ops around that as well. Right now, we've got
> the runtime pm hooks crossing two parts of the API.

Sure, will do that then, and remove the runtime pm hooks from map/unmap.

Thanks
Vivek
> Will