Re: [PATCH v17 01/23] x86/sgx: Update MAINTAINERS

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:07:14PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Yes, I think it could be renamed as sgx.c. Should the driver part be
> also called as sgx.ko?

I guess that's your call guys. The reason why I asked is because I like
shorter names and "sgx" is unambiguous enough. AFAICT, there's no one
else doing SGX atm.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.