Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: arc: fix potential double realease of mmap_sem

From: Peter Xu
Date: Mon Nov 05 2018 - 22:03:54 EST


On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 12:48:31AM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/31/18 8:24 PM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > In do_page_fault() of ARC we have:
> >
> > ...
> > fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags);
> >
> > /* If Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL, exit page fault "early" */
> > if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) {
> > if ((fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR) && !(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY))
> > up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); <---------------- [1]
> > if (user_mode(regs))
> > return;
> > }
> > ...
> > if (likely(!(fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR))) {
> > ...
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > if (fault & VM_FAULT_OOM)
> > goto out_of_memory; <----------------- [2]
> > else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV)
> > goto bad_area; <----------------- [3]
> > else if (fault & VM_FAULT_SIGBUS)
> > goto do_sigbus; <----------------- [4]
> >
> > Logically it's possible that we might try to release the mmap_sem twice
> > by having a scenario like:
> >
> > - task received SIGKILL,
> > - task handled kernel mode page fault,
> > - handle_mm_fault() returned with one of VM_FAULT_ERROR,
> >
> > Then we'll go into path [1] to release the mmap_sem, however we won't
> > return immediately since user_mode(regs) check will fail (a kernel page
> > fault). Then we might go into either [2]-[4] and either of them will
> > try to release the mmap_sem again.
> >
> > To fix this, we only release the mmap_sem at [1] when we're sure we'll
> > quit immediately (after we checked with user_mode(regs)).
>
> Hmm, do_page_fault() needs a serious makeover. There's a known problem in the area
> you touched (with test case) where we fail to relinquish the mmap_sem for which
> Alexey had provided a fix. But I'm going to redo this part now and CC you folks
> for review. OK ?

Fine with me. Thanks,

--
Peter Xu