Re: [PATCH v10 5/6] arm64: zynqmp: Add DDRC node

[Borislav Petkov]

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:37:00AM +0530, Manish Narani wrote:
> Add ddrc memory controller node in dts. The size mentioned in dts is
> 0x30000, because we need to access DDR_QOS INTR registers located at
> 0xFD090208 from this driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <manish.narani@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
> index 29ce234..a81d3b16 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi
> @@ -355,6 +355,13 @@
>  			xlnx,bus-width = <64>;
>  		};
>  
> +		mc: memory-controller@fd070000 {
> +			compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-ddrc-2.40a";
> +			reg = <0x0 0xfd070000 0x0 0x30000>;
> +			interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +			interrupts = <0 112 4>;
> +		};
> +
>  		gem0: ethernet@ff0b0000 {
>  			compatible = "cdns,zynqmp-gem", "cdns,gem";
>  			status = "disabled";
> -- 

Ok, talking to Mark on IRC, he says those DT changes normally go through
the arm-soc tree.

And I'm fine with that except if we do that, then the EDAC changes
go through my tree and those drivers could end up temporarily broken
depending on the merge order and timing.

So should we perhaps make an arm-soc shared, immutable branch which you
guys export for me with those DT changes applied, which I can merge into
my tree and apply the EDAC changes ontop.

This is what we've been doing with the tip tree until now and it has
proven successful.

Thoughts?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.