Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix spelling mistake, EACCESS -> EACCES

From: Steve French
Date: Fri Oct 26 2018 - 14:51:09 EST


merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 1:10 PM Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Trivial fix to a spelling mistake of the error access name EACCESS,
> rename to EACCES
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/cifs/file.c | 2 +-
> fs/cifs/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
> index 84477e995246..6894d071850a 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
> @@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ cifs_lock_add(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock)
> * Set the byte-range lock (mandatory style). Returns:
> * 1) 0, if we set the lock and don't need to request to the server;
> * 2) 1, if no locks prevent us but we need to request to the server;
> - * 3) -EACCESS, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
> + * 3) -EACCES, if there is a lock that prevents us and wait is false.
> */
> static int
> cifs_lock_add_if(struct cifsFileInfo *cfile, struct cifsLockInfo *lock,
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/inode.c b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> index 0945d40030eb..3685e2c25205 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/inode.c
> @@ -1305,8 +1305,8 @@ cifs_drop_nlink(struct inode *inode)
> /*
> * If d_inode(dentry) is null (usually meaning the cached dentry
> * is a negative dentry) then we would attempt a standard SMB delete, but
> - * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCESS
> - * but will return the EACCESS to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
> + * if that fails we can not attempt the fall back mechanisms on EACCES
> + * but will return the EACCES to the caller. Note that the VFS does not call
> * unlink on negative dentries currently.
> */
> int cifs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> --
> 2.19.1
>


--
Thanks,

Steve