Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-pil: Register segments/dumpfn for coredump

From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Mon Oct 08 2018 - 02:45:41 EST


On Fri 27 Jul 08:20 PDT 2018, Sibi Sankar wrote:

> Register the MDT segments and custom dumpfn with the remoteproc core
> dump functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> index ac3342f9ea5a..22bb049c3e7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
> @@ -1058,10 +1058,50 @@ static void *q6v5_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len)
> return qproc->mpss_region + offset;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_q6v5_register_dump_segments(struct rproc *rproc,
> + const struct firmware *fw_unused)

How about naming it mba_fw instead of unused? Just as unused, but easier
to understand why it isn't used.

> +{
> + const struct firmware *fw;
> + const struct elf32_phdr *phdrs;
> + const struct elf32_phdr *phdr;
> + const struct elf32_hdr *ehdr;
> + struct q6v5 *qproc = (struct q6v5 *)rproc->priv;

No need for an explicit typecast from void *.

The rest looks good!

Regards,
Bjorn