Re: [PATCH 1/4] tty: Drop tty->count on tty_reopen() failure

[Dmitry Safonov]

On Fri, 2018-08-31 at 08:47 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 08/29/2018, 06:13 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote:
> > > I would just do:
> > >   if (!retval)
> > >     tty->count++;
> > > here. Nobody from ldiscs should rely on tty->count.
> > 
> > I thought about that and probably should have described in commit
> > message why I haven't done that: I prefer to keep it as was as I
> > did Cc
> > stable tree - to keep the chance of regression to minimum.
> > 
> > I agree that your way is cleaner, but probably it may be done as
> > cleanup on top for linux-next..
> 
> Agreed, so care to cook it up as 5/4 in this series :)?

Sure, will resend v2 with that and all tested-by.

-- 
Thanks,
             Dmitry