Re: [PATCH 09/46] dmaengine: cppi41: use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code

From: Huang Shijie
Date: Fri Aug 03 2018 - 04:02:13 EST




å 2018å08æ03æ 15:55, Peter Ujfalusi åé:

On 2018-08-03 10:19, Huang Shijie wrote:
Use dmaenginem_async_device_register to simplify the code:
remove dma_async_device_unregister

Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <sjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c b/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
index 1497da367710..d2998a19ed2e 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/ti/cppi41.c
@@ -1096,21 +1096,19 @@ static int cppi41_dma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_chans;
cdd->irq = irq;
- ret = dma_async_device_register(&cdd->ddev);
+ ret = dmaenginem_async_device_register(&cdd->ddev);
if (ret)
goto err_chans;
ret = of_dma_controller_register(dev->of_node,
cppi41_dma_xlate, &cpp41_dma_info);
if (ret)
- goto err_of;
+ goto err_chans;
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
return 0;
-err_of:
- dma_async_device_unregister(&cdd->ddev);
err_chans:
deinit_cppi41(dev, cdd);
err_init_cppi:
@@ -1132,7 +1130,6 @@ static int cppi41_dma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s could not pm_runtime_get: %i\n",
__func__, error);
of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
- dma_async_device_unregister(&cdd->ddev);
If I read the code right then this is not safe.
We would have deinitalized cppi41 driver which is not functional, but we
will still have the dma device registered and if a channel is requested
we will have kernel crash.

It falls in the same case as omap-dma, edma.
Thanks for pointing this, we can drop the patches for omap-dma, edma.

Huang Shijie