Re: [PATCH] net/9p/trans_fd.c: fix double list_del() and race in access

From: jiangyiwen
Date: Sun Jul 22 2018 - 22:24:48 EST


On 2018/7/20 21:28, Tomas Bortoli wrote:
> This patch uses list_del_init() instead of list_del() to eliminate "req_list". This to prevent double list_del()'s calls to the same list from provoking a GPF. Furthermore, this patch fixes an access to "req_list" that was made without getting the relative lock.
>

I suggest you can apply a 72-character line limit to your
commit messages. Others looks good to me.

Thanks,
Yiwen.

> Signed-off-by: Tomas Bortoli <tomasbortoli@xxxxxxxxx>
> Reported-by: syzbot+735d926e9d1317c3310c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>
> net/9p/trans_fd.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> index a64b01c56e30..131bb1f059e6 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,9 @@ static void p9_conn_cancel(struct p9_conn *m, int err)
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(req, rtmp, &cancel_list, req_list) {
> p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR, "call back req %p\n", req);
> - list_del(&req->req_list);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&m->client->lock, flags);
> + list_del_init(&req->req_list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->client->lock, flags);
> if (!req->t_err)
> req->t_err = err;
> p9_client_cb(m->client, req, REQ_STATUS_ERROR);
> @@ -369,7 +371,7 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_lock(&m->client->lock);
> if (m->req->status != REQ_STATUS_ERROR)
> status = REQ_STATUS_RCVD;
> - list_del(&m->req->req_list);
> + list_del_init(&m->req->req_list);
> spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
> p9_client_cb(m->client, m->req, status);
> m->rc.sdata = NULL;
> @@ -684,7 +686,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancel(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
> spin_lock(&client->lock);
>
> if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_UNSENT) {
> - list_del(&req->req_list);
> + list_del_init(&req->req_list);
> req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
> ret = 0;
> }
> @@ -701,7 +703,7 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
> * remove it from the list.
> */
> spin_lock(&client->lock);
> - list_del(&req->req_list);
> + list_del_init(&req->req_list);
> spin_unlock(&client->lock);
>
> return 0;
>