Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] coresight: etm-perf: Add support for ETR backend

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Fri Jul 20 2018 - 05:07:16 EST


On 19/07/18 20:59, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 06:11:41PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Add support for using TMC-ETR as backend for ETM perf tracing.
We use software double buffering at the moment. i.e, the TMC-ETR
uses a separate buffer than the perf ring buffer. The data is
copied to the perf ring buffer once a session completes.

The TMC-ETR would try to match the larger of perf ring buffer
or the ETR buffer size configured via sysfs, scaling down to
a minimum limit of 1MB.

Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---

+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
+
+ tmc_flush_and_stop(drvdata);
+ tmc_sync_etr_buf(drvdata);
+
+ CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);

This is a copy/paste oversight, here you want to lock again.

Thanks for catching that, will fix it.


+ /* Reset perf specific data */
+ drvdata->perf_data = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+
+ size = etr_buf->len;
+ tmc_etr_sync_perf_buffer(etr_perf);
+
+ /*
+ * Update handle->head in snapshot mode. Also update the size to the
+ * hardware buffer size if there was an overflow.
+ */
+ if (etr_perf->snapshot) {
+ handle->head += size;
+ if (etr_buf->full)
+ size = etr_buf->size;
+ }
+
+ lost |= etr_buf->full;
+out:
+ if (lost)
+ perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED);
+ return size;
+}
+
static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, void *data)
{
- /* We don't support perf mode yet ! */
- return -EINVAL;
+ int rc = 0;
+ unsigned long flags;
+ struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
+ struct perf_output_handle *handle = data;
+ struct etr_perf_buffer *etr_perf = etm_perf_sink_config(handle);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+ /*
+ * There can be only one writer per sink in perf mode. If the sink
+ * is already open in SYSFS mode, we can't use it.
+ */
+ if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || drvdata->perf_data) {
+ rc = -EBUSY;

As discussed in the previous patch, I am missing a WARN_ON here : i.e,

+ if (drvdata->mode != CS_MODE_DISABLED || WARN_ON(drvdata->perf_data))

which was there in the previous version in set_buffer, which triggered some
warnings for me with testing.

+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!etr_perf || !etr_perf->etr_buf)) {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
+
+ etr_perf->head = PERF_IDX2OFF(handle->head, etr_perf);
+ drvdata->perf_data = etr_perf;
+ drvdata->mode = CS_MODE_PERF;
+ tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata, etr_perf->etr_buf);
+
+unlock_out:
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
+ return rc;
}
static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev,
@@ -1148,6 +1389,9 @@ static void tmc_disable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
static const struct coresight_ops_sink tmc_etr_sink_ops = {
.enable = tmc_enable_etr_sink,
.disable = tmc_disable_etr_sink,
+ .alloc_buffer = tmc_etr_alloc_perf_buffer,
+ .update_buffer = tmc_etr_update_perf_buffer,
+ .free_buffer = tmc_etr_free_perf_buffer,


.alloc_buffer = tmc_alloc_etr_buffer,
.update_buffer = tmc_update_etr_buffer,
.free_buffer = tmc_free_etr_buffer,

To be consistant with .enable and .disable along with the naming convention on
the ETF side.


Sure, I can change them.

Cheers
Suzuki