Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] Fix issues and cleanup for ERR_FATAL and ERR_NONFATAL

[poza]

On 2018-07-19 01:14, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> This is a v3 of Oza's patches [1].  It's available at [2] if you prefer
> git.
>
> v3 changes:
>   - Add pci_aer_clear_fatal_status() to clear ERR_FATAL bits, only 
> called
>     from pcie_do_fatal_recovery().  Moved to first in series to avoid a
>     window where ERR_FATAL recovery only clears ERR_NONFATAL bits.  
> Visible
>     only inside the PCI core.
>   - Instead of having pci_cleanup_aer_uncorrect_error_status() do 
> different
>     things based on dev->error_state, use this only for ERR_NONFATAL 
> bits.
>     I didn't change the name because it's used by many drivers.
>   - Rename pci_cleanup_aer_error_device_status() to
>     pci_aer_clear_device_status(), make it void, and make it visible 
> only
>     inside the PCI core.
>   - Remove pcie_portdrv_err_handler.slot_reset altogether instead of 
> making
>     it a stub function.  Possibly pcie_portdrv_err_handler could be 
> removed
>     completely?
>
> [1]
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1529661494-20936-1-git-send-email-poza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [2]
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/?h=pci/06-22-oza-aer
>
> ---
>
> Bjorn Helgaas (1):
>       PCI/AER: Clear only ERR_FATAL status bits during fatal recovery
>
> Oza Pawandeep (6):
>       PCI/AER: Clear only ERR_NONFATAL bits during non-fatal recovery
>       PCI/AER: Factor out ERR_NONFATAL status bit clearing
>       PCI/AER: Remove ERR_FATAL code from ERR_NONFATAL path
>       PCI/AER: Clear device status bits during ERR_FATAL and 
> ERR_NONFATAL
>       PCI/AER: Clear device status bits during ERR_COR handling
>       PCI/portdrv: Remove pcie_portdrv_err_handler.slot_reset
>
>
>  drivers/pci/pci.h              |    5 ++++
>  drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c         |   47 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/pci/pcie/err.c         |   15 +++++--------
>  drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_pci.c |   25 ---------------------
>  4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

looks good to me.
Thanks for the corrections.
some x86 compilation errors, you want me to to fix it and push v4 ?

Regards,
Oza.