Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: improve setsockopt() TCP_USER_TIMEOUT accuracy

[Jonathan Maxwell]

Okay I see what you mean looking some examples on:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/

I'll resubmit with the correct patch series numbers but with
the same detailed description.

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/17/2018 06:55 PM, Jonathan Maxwell wrote:
>> After committing the patches in my net-next git branch I used git send-mail:
>>
>> git send-email --identity=XXX --cover-letter --annotate origin
>> --compose --signoff
>>
>> and manually updated it based on an example of yours:
>>
>> https://lwn.net/Articles/706491/
>>
>> I can see the 3 patches that I just submitted on:
>>
>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
>>
>> Flagged as under review by DaveM.
>>
>
> I dunno, each patch belongs to a separate patch series, this is not expected.
>
> Compare to what happens on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/  for a proper submission.
>
> If you click on https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=56100  for example,
> you can see 5 patch in a series.
>
> Standard workflow :
>
> git-format-patch ...
>
> <edit cover letter>
>
> git send-email --to "David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" \
>         --cc "netdev <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" \
>         --cc "Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>" \
>         00*