Re: [PATCH v7 3/7] arm64: dts: msm8996: thermal: Initialise via DT and add second controller

[Matthias Kaehlcke]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 02:09:04PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote:
> We also split up the regmap address space into two, for the TM and SROT
> registers. This was required to deal with different address offsets for the
> TM and SROT registers across different SoC families.
> 
> 8996 has two TSENS IP blocks, initialise the second one too.
> 
> Since tsens-common.c/init_common() currently only registers one address
> space, the order is important (TM before SROT). This is OK since the code
> doesn't really use the SROT functionality yet.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> index 8c7f9ca..688e752 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> @@ -459,9 +459,19 @@
>  			status = "disabled";
>  		};
>  
> -		tsens0: thermal-sensor@4a8000 {
> +		tsens0: thermal-sensor@4a9000 {
                                       ~~~~~~

I suppose the address of the TM block is used here instead of the SROT
address (which is lower) since SROT functionality is currently not
used. Would/should this change if/when the driver uses SROT?

>  			compatible = "qcom,msm8996-tsens";
> -			reg = <0x4a8000 0x2000>;
> +			reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
> +			      <0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
> +			#qcom,sensors = <13>;
> +			#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
> +		};
> +
> +		tsens1: thermal-sensor@4ad000 {
> +			compatible = "qcom,msm8996-tsens";
> +			reg = <0x4ad000 0x1000>, /* TM */
> +			      <0x4ac000 0x1000>; /* SROT */
> +			#qcom,sensors = <8>;
>  			#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>  		};