[PATCH 4.17 099/220] mtd: rawnand: Do not check FAIL bit when executing a SET_FEATURES op

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Jul 01 2018 - 12:41:16 EST


4.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>

commit 782d1967d0479ffd59412b2f3179c8bb35f50ff6 upstream.

The ONFI spec clearly says that FAIL bit is only valid for PROGRAM,
ERASE and READ-with-on-die-ECC operations, and should be ignored
otherwise.

It seems that checking it after sending a SET_FEATURES is a bad idea
because a previous READ, PROGRAM or ERASE op may have failed, and
depending on the implementation, the FAIL bit is not cleared until a
new READ, PROGRAM or ERASE is started.

This leads to ->set_features() returning -EIO while it actually worked,
which can sometimes stop a batch of READ/PROGRAM ops.

Note that we only fix the ->exec_op() path here, because some drivers
are abusing the NAND_STATUS_FAIL flag in their ->waitfunc()
implementation to propagate other kind of errors, like
wait-ready-timeout or controller-related errors. Let's not try to fix
those drivers since they worked fine so far.

Fixes: 8878b126df76 ("mtd: nand: add ->exec_op() implementation")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 29 ++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -2174,7 +2174,6 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct n
struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
const u8 *params = data;
int i, ret;
- u8 status;

if (chip->exec_op) {
const struct nand_sdr_timings *sdr =
@@ -2188,26 +2187,18 @@ static int nand_set_features_op(struct n
};
struct nand_operation op = NAND_OPERATION(instrs);

- ret = nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- ret = nand_status_op(chip, &status);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
- } else {
- chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1);
- for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
- chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]);
-
- ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
- status = ret;
+ return nand_exec_op(chip, &op);
}

- if (status & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
+ chip->cmdfunc(mtd, NAND_CMD_SET_FEATURES, feature, -1);
+ for (i = 0; i < ONFI_SUBFEATURE_PARAM_LEN; ++i)
+ chip->write_byte(mtd, params[i]);
+
+ ret = chip->waitfunc(mtd, chip);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (ret & NAND_STATUS_FAIL)
return -EIO;

return 0;