Re: ACPI support in common clock framework

[Sudeep Holla]

On 25/06/18 17:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2018-06-16 08:50:18)
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 7:43 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is this for clk_enable/disable? What about clk_set_rate() or
>>> clk_set_phase()? Is ACPI's AML taking care of that?
>>
>> That's for clk_enable/disable AFAICS.
>>
>> AML doesn't manage device performance states at all.
> 
> Alright. We may need to add a better way for device drivers to get
> handles to clk pointers on ACPI firmware so they can change frequencies
> or phase, etc. 

Is there any specific usecase/device needing this in the kernel ? SPI
slaves ?

> Right now it's all through clkdev and it looks to be
> mostly based on string matching of connection names instead of
> associating clks with devices.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep