[PATCH memory-model 8/8] atomic_ops.rst: Use `warning` rst directive

From: Paul E. McKenney
Date: Mon May 14 2018 - 18:54:54 EST


From: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>

One warning message in 'atomic_ops.rst' is not using 'warning' rst
directive while others does. This commit modifies the message to use
'warning' rst directive.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
index 4ea4af71e68a..2e7165f86f55 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/atomic_ops.rst
@@ -466,10 +466,12 @@ Like the above, except that these routines return a boolean which
indicates whether the changed bit was set _BEFORE_ the atomic bit
operation.

-WARNING! It is incredibly important that the value be a boolean,
-ie. "0" or "1". Do not try to be fancy and save a few instructions by
-declaring the above to return "long" and just returning something like
-"old_val & mask" because that will not work.
+
+.. warning::
+ It is incredibly important that the value be a boolean, ie. "0" or "1".
+ Do not try to be fancy and save a few instructions by declaring the
+ above to return "long" and just returning something like "old_val &
+ mask" because that will not work.

For one thing, this return value gets truncated to int in many code
paths using these interfaces, so on 64-bit if the bit is set in the
--
2.5.2