Re: [PATCH v3] selftests: add headers_install to lib.mk

From: Daniel Borkmann
Date: Mon May 14 2018 - 15:20:44 EST


On 05/14/2018 01:58 PM, Anders Roxell wrote:
> If the kernel headers aren't installed we can't build all the tests.
> Add a new make target rule 'khdr' in the file lib.mk to generate the
> kernel headers and that gets include for every test-dir Makefile that
> includes lib.mk If the testdir in turn have its own sub-dirs the
> top_srcdir needs to be set to the linux-rootdir to be able to generate
> the kernel headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Fathi Boudra <fathi.boudra@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Makefile | 14 +-------------
> scripts/subarch.include | 13 +++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/android/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/android/ion/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 5 ++---
> tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/gpio/Makefile | 7 ++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 7 ++-----
> tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 10 ++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 4 ----
> 10 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 scripts/subarch.include
[...]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index 438d4f93875b..9741609a0eb1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -16,9 +16,8 @@ LDLIBS += -lcap -lelf -lrt -lpthread
> TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS = $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read
> all: $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS)
>
> -$(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS): urandom_read
> -
> -urandom_read: urandom_read.c
> +$(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS):| khdr
> +$(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS): urandom_read.c
> $(CC) -o $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) -static $<
>
> # Order correspond to 'make run_tests' order

Can you elaborate on the error in BPF you're seeing that would force a
headers_install for it? Some people are running the tools/ infrastructure
(incl. BPF kselftests) outside of kernel tree where this dependency would
break their setup. Why BPF bits cannot be fixed otherwise?

Thanks,
Daniel