Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/cgroup: memory controller self-tests

[Tejun Heo]

On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 01:33:26PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Yeah. I see that. You have a switch for the KSFT_ values. Since there is no
> dependency on the cgroup tree, I would recommend having this patch go through
> kselftest tree which is the normal process for tests anyway.
> 
> This version is good and I can apply this to linux-kselftest next. I ran a
> quick test and the Skip case looks good.
> 
> TAP version 13
> selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol
> ========================================
> 1..0 # Skipped: memory controller isn't available
> not ok 1..1 selftests: cgroup: test_memcontrol [SKIP]
> 
> 
> Tejun! Please send me your Ack.

Sure, please feel free to add my ack.  I'll revert the original patch
from cgroup tree.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun