Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: added new pwm-sifive driver documentation

[Wesley Terpstra]

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Andreas FÃrber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> "pwm0" sounds like a zero-indexed instance of some pwm block. If 0 is
> the version here, I'd suggest to make it "pwm-0" for example - you might
> want to take a look at the Xilinx bindings, which use a strict x.yy suffix.

That's fine. I'll change it to pwm-0.00 in the next patch series.

> Most SoCs don't have clearly versioned IP though, that's why for
> community-contributed bindings the first SoC we encounter the IP in
> usually gets the name.

In this particular case, we do have versioned IP, and we will be
contributing drivers for those which wind up in linux-capable chips.