Re: [PATCH 2/2] bpf: btf: remove a couple conditions

From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Fri Apr 27 2018 - 16:32:23 EST


On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:21:17PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/27/2018 09:39 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:55:46AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:20:25AM -0700, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:04:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>>> We know "err" is zero so we can remove these and pull the code in one
> >>>> indent level.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Thanks for the simplification!
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@xxxxxx>
> >> btw, it should be for bpf-next. Please tag the subject with bpf-next when
> >> you respin. Thanks!
>
> Dan, thanks a lot for your fixes! Please respin with addressing Martin's
> feedback when you get a chance.
>

My understanding is that he'd prefer we just ignore the static checker
warning since it's a false positive. Should I instead initialize the
size to zero or something just to silence it?

regards,
dan carpenter