Re: [RFC PATCH] sdhci: arasan: Add runtime PM support

From: Michal Simek
Date: Tue Apr 10 2018 - 08:06:40 EST


Hi Adrian,

On 10.4.2018 13:42, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 29/03/18 08:48, naranimanish@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> From: Manish Narani <mnarani@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> This patch adds runtime PM support in Arasan SD driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <mnarani@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Just a couple of comments about style.
>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> index c33a5f7..47196b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>> #include <linux/regmap.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> @@ -349,6 +350,75 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_arasan_cqe_pdata = {
>> SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLOCK_DIV_ZERO_BROKEN,
>> };
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>> +/**
>> + * sdhci_arasan_runtime_suspend - Suspend method for the driver
>> + * @dev: Address of the device structure
>> + * Returns 0 on success and error value on error
>> + *
>> + * Put the device in a low power state.
>> + */
>
> Kernel style is not to put kerneldoc on callback functions.

I have never read that there are some sort of list of functions which
shouldn't be covered by kernel-doc.
What's the problem with using kerneldoc format here? Maybe I am not
getting your comments.

Thanks,
Michal