Re: [PATCH 05/20] afs: Implement @sys substitution handling

From: Nikolay Borisov
Date: Fri Apr 06 2018 - 13:55:03 EST




On 6.04.2018 11:13, David Howells wrote:
> Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> lookup_one_len() seriously depends upon exclusive lock
>
> In the code it says:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!inode_is_locked(base->d_inode));
>
> which checks i_rwsem, but in the banner comment it says:
>
> * The caller must hold base->i_mutex.
>
> is one of these wrong?

Before the switch to i_rwsem, inodes had only i_mutex, so in fact the
comment is likely stale.

>
> David
>