Re: [PATCH 2/2] reset: uniphier: add SATA reset control support and change SATA-PHY ID

From: Philipp Zabel
Date: Tue Apr 03 2018 - 04:47:18 EST


On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 17:35 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-04-03 17:18 GMT+09:00 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 18:44 +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote:
> > > Add reset lines for SATA controller on UniPhier SoCs.
> > > This adds support for Pro4 and PXs3 in addition to PXs2.
> > >
> > > And this changes the ID of the reset line for SATA-PHY on PXs2.
> > > Since some SoCs have two controller instances with a common PHY, this moves
> > > the ID of SATA-PHY for consistency.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> > > index 55ae0f1..90e6caf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-uniphier.c
> > > @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pro4_sys_reset_data[] = {
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(12, 0x2000, 6), /* GIO (Ether, SATA, USB3) */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(14, 0x2000, 17), /* USB30 */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(15, 0x2004, 17), /* USB31 */
> > > + UNIPHIER_RESETX(28, 0x2000, 18), /* SATA0 */
> > > + UNIPHIER_RESETX(29, 0x2004, 18), /* SATA1 */
> > > + UNIPHIER_RESETX(30, 0x2000, 19), /* SATA-PHY */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(40, 0x2000, 13), /* AIO */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESET_END,
> > > };
> > > @@ -90,7 +93,7 @@ static const struct uniphier_reset_data uniphier_pxs2_sys_reset_data[] = {
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(20, 0x2014, 5), /* USB31-PHY0 */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(21, 0x2014, 1), /* USB31-PHY1 */
> > > UNIPHIER_RESETX(28, 0x2014, 12), /* SATA */
> > > - UNIPHIER_RESET(29, 0x2014, 8), /* SATA-PHY (active high) */
> > > + UNIPHIER_RESET(30, 0x2014, 8), /* SATA-PHY (active high) */
> >
> > This is a backwards incompatible change.
> > There is no DT in use that relies on this being 29 ?
>
>
> Right. No user for this reset line ever.

Thank you, I have applied both patches to reset/next.

regards
Philipp